Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2023
Abstract
Agencies and legislators have raised concerns that acquisitions backed by private equity (PE) threaten competition, but few, if any, have offered explanations as to why they pose a unique threat. In this article, we argue that many PE-backed acquisitions may avoid antitrust enforcement because they escape detection. Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, parties intending to merge must notify federal authorities and wait for clearance. However, various exemptions exist based on the size of the transaction, parties involved, and proportion of control conferred by the merger. Recent work demonstrates that to police mergers effectively, agencies must be informed about transactions in their incipiency, meaning that in many economically important industries, the contours of the premerger notification program under the Act are, in practice, the same as the contours of the substantive legal standard. We show that when the Act’s exemptions are applied to PE’s standard investment structure, which use an array of intermediate special purpose vehicles to minimize taxes, share risks, and distribute fees, PE-backed acquisitions that would otherwise be reportable may be exempt. We support our argument with merger and filing data.
Citation
Aslihan Asil et al., Misaligned Measures of Control: Private Equity's Antitrust Loophole, 18 Virginia Law and Business Review 51-92 (2023)
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Private equity, Antitrust law, Consolidation and merger of corporations
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/4446