A Judicial Postscript to the Church-State Debates of 1989: How Porous the Wall, How Civil the State?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1990
Abstract
This work is a continuation of the debate regarding the Establishment Clause. The focus lies with Justice O’Connor’s concurrence in County of Allegheny v. ACLU and how this opinion harkens back to a concept shared by Jefferson and Madison, that the establishment clause is designed to prevent government favoritism.
Citation
William W. Van Alstyne, A Judicial Postscript to the Church-State Debates of 1989: How Porous the Wall, How Civil the State?, 4 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 559-566 (1990)
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Supreme Court, Church and state--United States., Constitution. 1st Amendment, Freedom of religion--United States., Religion, Church and state
Included in
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/3197