Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1974
Abstract
This comparison of United States v. Nixon and the Pentagon Papers case finds the greatest similarity and significance shared by the two cases was the anti-climactic nature of their conclusions. While both cases concerned constitutional questions of the highest order, centered around the scope of the executive power, both cases were drawn on such narrow grounds that there was hardly any effect on constitutional law doctrine.
Citation
William W. Van Alstyne, A Political and Constitutional Review of United States v. Nixon, 22 UCLA Law Review 116-140 (1974)
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Richard Nixon, Judicial review, Executive privilege (Government information), Impeachments, Supreme Court, United States v. Nixon, Watergate Affair, Pentagon Papers, Executive power
Included in
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/3118