The Duke Lacrosse Case, Innocence, and False Identifications: A Fundamental Failure to “Do Justice

Authors

Robert P. Mosteller, Duke Law SchoolFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2007

Abstract

The Duke lacrosse case was a disaster - a caricature. The case, which involved false rape charges against three Duke University lacrosse players, began with gang rape allegations by an exotic dancer at a team party in March 2006 and ended with the declaration of their innocence in April 2007 and the disbarment of Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong in June of that year. Often a full examination of the facts of a notorious case reveals that events were ambiguous and the reality is not as bad as early reports suggested. This case does not fit that pattern; it gets worse on inspection.

Citation

Robert P. Mosteller, The Duke Lacrosse Case, Innocence, and False Identifications: A Fundamental Failure to “Do Justice, 76 Fordham Law Review 1337-1412 (2007)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License