This article develops an empirical model of firms’ choice of corporate laws under inertia. Delaware dominates the incorporation market, though recently Nevada, a state whose laws are highly protective of managers, has acquired a sizable market share. Using a novel database of incorporation decisions from 1995- 2013, we show that most firms dislike protectionist laws, such as anti-takeover statutes and liability protections for officers, and that Nevada’s rise is due to the preferences of small firms.Our estimates indicate that despite inertia, Delaware would lose significant market share and revenues if it adopted protectionist laws. Our findings support the hypothesis that Delaware faces competitive pressure to maintain its current laws, and that managers are willing to commit to such laws in order to attract capital.
Ofer Eldar & Lorenzo Magnolfi, Regulatory Competition and the Market for Corporate Law (August 6, 2017)
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Corporation law, Corporate governance, Incorporation, Financial institutions--Law and legislation
Business Organizations Law Commons, Commercial Law Commons, Corporate Finance Commons, Securities Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/3636