This Article describes the results from fifty-seven interviews with corporate directors and a limited number of other persons (including institutional investors, search firm personnel, and the like) regarding their views on corporate board diversity. It highlights numerous tensions in these views. Most directors, for instance, proclaim that diverse boards are good, but very few directors can articulate their reasons for this belief. Some directors have suggested that diverse boards work better than non-diverse boards, but gave relatively few concrete examples of specific instances where a female or minority board member made a special contribution related to that director’s race or gender. Many directors noted the importance of collegiality and getting along in the boardroom, while simultaneously extolling the advantages of different perspectives in avoiding groupthink. Although all acknowledged the importance of fitting in, few considered whether this impeded the role of “outsiders” providing a diverse perspective. This Article also explores directors’ thoughts on why progress in improving board diversity has been so slow if most agree that diversity is an important goal.
Kimberly D. Krawiec et al., The Danger of Difference: Tensions in Directors’ View of Corporate Board Diversity, 2013 University of Illinois Law Review 919-958
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Race discrimination, Boards of directors, Ethnology, Corporate governance, Cultural pluralism, Qualitative research, Sex (Psychology)
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Organizations Law Commons
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/3071