Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-16-2015
Subject Category
Law
Abstract
This Essay, a response to Russell L. Weaver's symposium contribution, "Advice and Consent" in Historical Perspective, first explores the Appointments Clause’s antecedents in the Age of Enlightenment and its emergence in the Constitutional Convention in 1787, showing how its sturdy separation-of-powers foundation was built. In Part II, the Essay focuses on the historical realities of the Clause’s two-branch process, especially how the operability of two political bodies naturally yields results consonant with the etiquette and political sensibilities of the day. Then, in Part III, it offers several suggestions on how to cabin the potentially untrammeled discretion of the Senate in responding to presidential nominations.
Recommended Citation
Steven I. Friedland, “Advice and Consent” In the Appointments Clause: From Another Historical Perspective, 64 Duke Law Journal Online 173-191 (2015)