Event Title

Legislative Courts, Administrative Agencies, and the Northern Pipeline Decision

Presenter Information

Martin H. Redish

Location

Duke Law School

Start Date

28-1-1983 8:45 AM

End Date

28-1-1983 10:00 AM

Description

In Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., the Supreme Court held unconstitutional the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Courts because their judges lacked article 111"s protections of salary and tenure. In so holding the Court significantly altered the criteria for deciding what cases have to be heard by judges with article 111 protections. In this article, Professor Redsh criticizes the criteria adopted by the Justices, and suggests alternative criteria which would better foster the values behind the independence protections of article III In addition, he examines the implications of the various criteria for the continued use of administrative agencies as adjudicators of federal law.

Comments

This event was not recorded.

Related Paper

Martin H. Redish, Legislative Courts, Administrative Agencies, and the Northern Pipeline Decision, 1983 Duke Law Journal 197-229 (1983)

Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol32/iss2/1


This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jan 28th, 8:45 AM Jan 28th, 10:00 AM

Legislative Courts, Administrative Agencies, and the Northern Pipeline Decision

Duke Law School

In Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., the Supreme Court held unconstitutional the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Courts because their judges lacked article 111"s protections of salary and tenure. In so holding the Court significantly altered the criteria for deciding what cases have to be heard by judges with article 111 protections. In this article, Professor Redsh criticizes the criteria adopted by the Justices, and suggests alternative criteria which would better foster the values behind the independence protections of article III In addition, he examines the implications of the various criteria for the continued use of administrative agencies as adjudicators of federal law.