Event Title

FCC Regulation of the Telecommunications Press

Presenter Information

David L. Bazelon

Location

Duke Law School

Start Date

24-1-1975 9:00 AM

End Date

24-1-1975 10:15 AM

Description

The author thinks we would not tolerate this sort of regulation in any context other than telecommunications; the First Amendment would forbid it. But somehow telecommunications speech is different and permits, many think, a different First Amendment regime. The author seeks here to raise questions about this assumption through an exploration of the justifications generally offered to support this different First Amendment regime for telecommunications speech. After exploring those justifications, the author will offer some alternative strategies for reforming telecommunications regulation in a manner which both eliminates present intrusion into protected speech and forwards the First Amendment interest of diversity of ideas.

Comments

This event was not recorded.

Related Paper

David L. Bazelon, FCC Regulation of the Telecommunications Press, 1975 Duke Law Journal 213-251 (1975)

Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol24/iss2/1


This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jan 24th, 9:00 AM Jan 24th, 10:15 AM

FCC Regulation of the Telecommunications Press

Duke Law School

The author thinks we would not tolerate this sort of regulation in any context other than telecommunications; the First Amendment would forbid it. But somehow telecommunications speech is different and permits, many think, a different First Amendment regime. The author seeks here to raise questions about this assumption through an exploration of the justifications generally offered to support this different First Amendment regime for telecommunications speech. After exploring those justifications, the author will offer some alternative strategies for reforming telecommunications regulation in a manner which both eliminates present intrusion into protected speech and forwards the First Amendment interest of diversity of ideas.