Document Type
Supreme Court Commentaries
Publication Date
3-23-2006
Keywords
Civil Rights
Subject Category
Constitutional Law | Law
Abstract
Following his murder conviction, Felix filed a pro se habeas petition alleging Sixth Amendment violations at trial The petition was filed within the one-year Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act deadline. He was later appointed counsel, who filed an amended petition alleging Fifth Amendment violations; but that petition was filed five months after the AEDPA deadline had passed. The Court held that the amended petition was not saved by the Relation Back doctrine because it did not share with the earlier claims a common "core of operative facts."
Recommended Citation
Aleksandra Kopec, Mayle v. Felix, 1 Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar 9-15 (2006)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djclpp_sidebar/2