2008 | Public and Private Law in the Global Adjudication System

Event Title

Topic II: Arbitration v. Courts - Mechanism and Choice of Forum

Location

Duke Law School, Room 4047

Start Date

15-2-2008 10:45 AM

End Date

15-2-2008 12:15 PM

Description

Why do parties choose to bring disputes before arbitral tribunals rather than national courts? Are arbitral tribunals replacing courts as the dispute-resolution mechanism of choice in transnational cases, or is a counter-trend towards courts emerging? Can arbitral tribunals exist without the enforcement mechanisms of national courts? In this discussion, panelists answer these questions, and discuss other aspects of the relationship of arbitral and national adjudication.

Appearing: Donald L. Horowitz (Duke Law School), moderator ; Thomas E. Carbonneau (Dickinson School of Law), Charles H. Brower II (University of Mississippi School of Law), and Christopher A. Whytock (S.J. Quinney College of Law ), panelists.

Streaming Media

Related Paper

Thomas E. Carbonneau, Commercial Peace and Political Competition in the Crosshairs of International Arbitration, 18 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 311-338 (2008)

Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol18/iss2/3

Related Paper II

Charles H. Bower II, The Functions and Limits of Arbitration and Judicial Settlement Under Private and Public International Law, 18 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 259-310 (2008)

Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol18/iss2/2

Related Paper III

Christopher A. Whytock, Litigation, Arbitration, and the Transnational Shadow of Law, 18 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 449-475 (2008)

Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol18/iss2/8

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Feb 15th, 10:45 AM Feb 15th, 12:15 PM

Topic II: Arbitration v. Courts - Mechanism and Choice of Forum

Duke Law School, Room 4047

Why do parties choose to bring disputes before arbitral tribunals rather than national courts? Are arbitral tribunals replacing courts as the dispute-resolution mechanism of choice in transnational cases, or is a counter-trend towards courts emerging? Can arbitral tribunals exist without the enforcement mechanisms of national courts? In this discussion, panelists answer these questions, and discuss other aspects of the relationship of arbitral and national adjudication.

Appearing: Donald L. Horowitz (Duke Law School), moderator ; Thomas E. Carbonneau (Dickinson School of Law), Charles H. Brower II (University of Mississippi School of Law), and Christopher A. Whytock (S.J. Quinney College of Law ), panelists.