Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men

Authors

Neil Vidmar, Duke Law SchoolFollow
Sara Sun Beale, Duke Law SchoolFollow
Erwin Chemerinsky, Duke Law SchoolFollow
James E. Coleman Jr., Duke Law SchoolFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2007

Citation

Neil Vidmar et al., Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men, 82 Chicago-Kent Law Review 691-710 (2007)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License