Submissions from 2020
The Wrong Choice to Address School Choice: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, Brooke Reczka
Has Revenge Become a Justification to Legitimize the Death Penalty?, Jordan Ryan
Stand in the Place Where Data Live: Data Breaches as Article III Injuries, Jason Wasserman
Pretrial and Error: The Use of Statements Inadmissible at Trial in Preliminary Proceedings, Erin Hughes
Campus Sexual Assault and Due Process, Ilana Frier
DHS v. Regents of the University of California: Administrative Law Concerns in Repealing DACA, Charles Fendrych
Contracting Free From Racial Animus: Comcast Corporation v. National Association of African American-Owned Media and Entertainment Studios, Catherine Tarantino
Questioning the Definition of "Sex" in Title VII: Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., Katherine Carter
Kahler v. Kansas: The End of the Insanity Defense?, Eric Roytman
Kansas v. Glover and the Issue of Reasonable Suspicion, Zach Kumar
Submissions from 2019
Let History Repeat Itself: Solving Originalism's History Problem in Interpreting the Establishment Clause, Neil Joseph
Gamble v. United States: A Commentary, Kayla Mullen
Litigating War: The Justiciability of Executive War Power, Chris Smith
The Race Horse That Wouldn't Die: On Herrera v. Wyoming, Benjamin Cantor
Apple v. Pepper: Applying the Indirect Purchaser Rule to Online Platforms, Jason Wasserman
A Test of Sovereignty: Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Gilbert P. Hyatt, Timothy Dill
Legislator-Led Legislative Prayer and the Search for Religious Neutrality, Aishwarya Masrani
Bucklew v. Precythe: The Power of Assumptions and Lethal Injection, Renata Gomez
Stepping into the Breach: State Constitutions as a Vehicle for Advancing Rights-Based Climate Litigation, Benjamin T. Sharp
Swords into Plowshares: Nuclear Power and the Atomic Energy Act’s Preemptive Scope in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, Francis X. Liesman
Timbs v. Indiana: The Constitutionality of Civil Forfeiture When Used by States, Kris Fernandez
Submissions from 2018
Racing on Two Different Tracks: Using Substantive Due Process to Challenge Tracking in Schools, Katarina Wong
Compelled Speech, Expressive Conduct, and Wedding Cakes: A Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Andrew Jensen
Compelled Speech, Expressive Conduct, and Wedding Cakes: A Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Andrew Jensen
Patchak v. Zinke, Separation of Powers, and the Pitfalls of Form over Substance, Michael Fisher