Abstract
Alter highlights the diverse nature of international delegations to courts. She argues that the roles and tasks delegated to international courts increasingly mimic in form and content the broad variety of tasks delegated to courts in liberal democracies, but that delegating these tasks to international courts is fundamentally different than delegating them to domestic courts because of the implications for national sovereignty. Whereas international courts were initially established to be dispute-resolution bodies, they now also perform administrative review, enforcement, and even constitutional review. Alter explains how each of these judicial roles binds other actors, binds states, or both.
Citation
Karen J. Alter,
Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation,
71 Law and Contemporary Problems
37-76
(Winter 2008)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol71/iss1/3