Abstract
The dilemma underlying the debate about the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over non-party nationals stems primarily from the conflicting needs for the ICC to have sufficient jurisdictional powers to bring to justice perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, and simultaneously, for states to retain appropriate discretion regarding methods of dispute settlement when the lawfulness of their official acts is in dispute.
Citation
Madeline Morris,
High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non-party States,
64 Law and Contemporary Problems
13-66
(Winter 2001)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol64/iss1/3