Abstract
While it seems that a President who disagrees with the Supreme Court's account of the Constitution faces only two choices--to enforce the Court's decision or defy the Court and take his case to a skeptical populace--there is a third way in which the President can publicly embrace the doctrine in question, while at the same time refusing to follow it. Pres Clinton's Administration has followed just such a third way approach to "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke."
Citation
Alan J. Meese,
Bakke Betrayed,
63 Law and Contemporary Problems
479-506
(Winter 2000)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol63/iss1/21