Abstract
The contractarian and fiduciary-based positions of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) and the observation that RUPA is internally contradictory and does not consistently adopt either position are discussed. Professor Hynes' discussion of the waivability of fiduciary duties under RUPA is critiqued.
Citation
Allan W. Vestal,
Advancing the Search for Compromise: A Response to Professor Hynes,
58 Law and Contemporary Problems
55-79
(Spring 1995)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol58/iss2/4