Abstract
Gregory S. Alexander's argument that pension funds, which are passively owned, can act as a device for achieving workplace democracy is criticized. It is argued that Alexander places the wrong emphasis on the relationship between property ownership and public responsibility.
Citation
Bruce A. Wolk,
Comment: Passions and Passivity,
56 Law and Contemporary Problems
141-148
(Winter 1993)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol56/iss1/6