Abstract
This Article explores the difficulties that high technology markets pose for patent law and, in particular, for patent injunctions. It then outlines the ways in which “open source innovation” is unusually vulnerable to patent injunctions. It argues that courts can recognize this vulnerability, and respond to the particular competitive and innovative benefits of open source innovation, by flexibly applying the Supreme Court’s ruling in eBay v. MercExchange. Having dealt with the lamentable failure of the International Trade Commission to exercise a similar flexibility in its own patent jurisprudence, despite statutory and constitutional provisions that counsel otherwise, the Article concludes with some recommendations for reform.
Citation
James Boyle, Open Source Innovation, Patent Injunctions, and the Public Interest, 11 Duke Law & Technology Review 30-64 (2012)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol11/iss1/2