Abstract
For years, graduate and other student researchers at universities have alleged that the hierarchical system in academic research allows supervising PhDs to steal and patent inventions that were rightfully discovered by students. In July 2001, the Federal Circuit finally addressed these concerns by interpreting the law in a way that strictly protects the rights of student researchers. This article examines this long-overdue change in the law and discusses its potential implications.
Citation
Kyle Grimshaw, A Victory for the Student Researcher: Chou v. University of Chicago, 1 Duke Law & Technology Review 1-7 (2001)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol1/iss1/35