Abstract
For generations, Pierson v. Post, the famous fox case, has introduced students to the study of property law. Two hundred years after the case was decided, this Article examines the history of the case to show both how it fits into the American ideology of property, and how the facts behind the dispute challenge that ideology. Pierson is a canonical case because it replicates a central myth of American property law: that we start with a world in which no one has rights to anything, and the fundamental problem is how best to convert it to absolute individual ownership. The history behind the dispute, however, suggests that the heart of the conflict was a contest over which community would control the shared resources of the town and how those resources would be used.
Citation
Bethany R. Berger,
It’s Not About the Fox: The Untold History of Pierson v. Post,
55 Duke Law Journal
1089-1143
(2006)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol55/iss6/1