Abstract
According to traditional notions, a parolee is not entitled to even the minimal safeguards of procedural due process. The Sixth Circuit echoed those sentiments in the recent case of Rose v. Haskins. This note, however, maintains that the Rose rationale, when analyzed in light of contemporary Supreme Court decisions, is no longer viable.
Citation
Constitutional Law: Parole Status and the Privilege Concept,
1969 Duke Law Journal
139-151
(1969)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol18/iss1/5