Abstract
This Article places the Alaska Constitution in historical perspective by comparing it with other state constitutions. It first considers how the convention delegates’ need to satisfy four audiences—Congress, Alaska residents who would ratify the constitution, those who would live under the constitution, and posterity—affected the constitution’s design. It next shows how the Alaska Constitution reflects the fact that it is the state’s first constitution, that it is a western constitution, and that it is a mid-twentieth-century constitution. Finally, it compares the Alaska Constitution with the Hawaii Constitution, which was drafted at the same time.
Citation
G. Alan Tarr,
Of Time, Place, and the Alaska Constitution,
35 Alaska Law Review
155-175
(2018)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol35/iss2/5