Abstract
In recent decades, the criminal-justice pendulum has swung to the opposite extreme. Criminal law is often described as covering disputes between the offender and the state. Victims are not direct parties to criminal proceedings, they have no formal right to either initiate or terminate a criminal action, and they have no control over the punishment meted out to offenders. In this state-centric system, victim needs have been left unsatisfied, giving rise to a politically powerful victims' rights movement that has had success in giving victims rights of access to prosecutors and rights to be heard in the courtroom. Here, O'Hara and Robbins propose changing the manner in which control rights over criminal sanctions are distributed.
Citation
Erin Ann O'Hara & Maria Mayo Robbins,
Using Criminal Punishment to Serve Both Victim and Social Needs,
72 Law and Contemporary Problems
199-218
(Spring 2009)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol72/iss2/17