Article Title
Abstract
Gregory S. Alexander's argument that pension funds, which are passively owned, can act as a device for achieving workplace democracy is criticized. It is argued that Alexander places the wrong emphasis on the relationship between property ownership and public responsibility.
Publication Citation
Bruce A. Wolk,
Comment: Passions and Passivity,
56 Law and Contemporary Problems
141-148
(Winter 1993).
Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol56/iss1/6