Abstract
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the following discussion of the nature of legal reasoning. In the course of the dialogue the author notes similarities and dissimilarities between legal reasoning and philosophical and mathematical reasoning. In the end we are left with a clearer insight into the distinctive features of the adjudicative process.
Citation
Roy L. Stone-de Montpensier,
Metaphysics and Law,
1969 Duke Law Journal
897-929
(1969)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol18/iss5/2