Abstract
Expert witnessing is a particularly useful place to observe the clash of legal and scientific conventions because it is here that one group of people (scientific experts) who are integrated into one set of conventions are challenged by the expectations of a different set of conventions. Here, Sanders looks at how legal conventions affect the behavior of expert witnesses when they appear in court in both criminal and civil cases. He also reviews differences in scientific and legal conventions as they apply to expert knowledge and discusses two central reasons for these differences: adversarialism and closure.
Citation
Joseph Sanders,
Science, Law and the Expert Witness,
72 Law and Contemporary Problems
63-90
(Winter 2009)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol72/iss1/5