Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

2016

Keywords

Regulatory competition, corporate governance, anti-takeover statutes, directors and officers liability, Delaware, Nevada, discrete choice models, inertia

Abstract

This article develops an empirical model of firms’ choice of corporate laws under inertia. Delaware dominates the incorporation market, though recently Nevada, a state whose laws are highly protective of managers, has acquired a sizable market share. Using a novel database of incorporation decisions from 1995- 2013, we show that most firms dislike protectionist laws, such as anti-takeover statutes and liability protections for officers, and that Nevada’s rise is due to the preferences of small firms. Consistent with the bonding hypothesis, our estimates indicate that despite inertia, Delaware would lose significant market share and revenues if it adopted protectionist laws.

Library of Congress Subject Headings

Corporation law, Corporate governance, Incorporation, Financial institutions--Law and legislation

Share

COinS